4
$\begingroup$

I question the need for having separate and tags. I think those concepts will rarely be distinct in terms of the questions we have here. What do you think? My inclination would be to merge into .

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
3
$\begingroup$

The tag currently has 17 questions, and currently has 58. Neither of them have a tag wiki. They seem to be used for exactly the same purpose.

I think we should 1) make a synonym of , 2) add a tag wiki for , 3) retag questions that don't follow the new tag wiki.

$\endgroup$
3
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I did step one. I'll leave step 2 and 3 to the community. $\endgroup$
    – called2voyage Mod
    Feb 13, 2019 at 14:20
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ What aspects of time will the tag cover? Everything from physics and GR concepts to calculating the time that the Sun rises tomorrow? It could be quite a challenging wiki to write! $\endgroup$
    – uhoh
    Feb 14, 2019 at 14:49
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @uhoh I think the tag should focus on time as a tool and not the concept of time in physics. That seems to be the bulk of the usage. I think space-time and the relativity tags cover the physics concepts pretty well. $\endgroup$
    – called2voyage Mod
    Feb 14, 2019 at 17:51

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .